HOME  |   FRANÇAIS MOHLTC  |   CONTACT US
Full Report: PDF
Report Contents
Health Unit Profiles
Indicators
» Group A - Population Health
   Indicators
» Group B - Governance and
   Accountability Indicators
 –  Introduction
 –  Total Board of Health
     Expenditures
 –  Board of Health Expenditure
     Variance
 –  Expenditures on Training and
     Professional Development
 –  Numbers of FTEs by Job
     Category
 –  Number of Vacant Positions
     by Job Category
 –  Employment Status of
     Medical Officers of Health
 –  Staff Length of Service
 –  Familiarity with Public Health
     Unit Programs and Services
 –  Issuance of a Health Status
     Report
 –  Strategic Plan
 –  Emergency Response Plan
     Tested
 –  Accreditation Status
 –  Medical Officer of Health
     Performance Evaluation
 –  Medical Officer of Health
     Reporting Relationships
 –  Board Member Orientation
 –  Board Self-Evaluation
Case Studies
Supporting Documents
Initial Report on Public Health
Expenditures on Training and Professional Development
Narrative

The indicator for expenditures on training and professional development is defined as the percentage of board of health total actual expenditures for "core and related public health programs and services" used to support staff training and professional development costs.

Spending on training and professional development is a measure of a board of health’s investment to support staff in their ongoing skill enhancement and maintenance for effective public health practice. Given the emphasis on the need to use evidence informed approaches, it is essential that staff have opportunities to enhance their knowledge. Access to current information on new methods of practice contributes to improvements in the delivery of public health programs and services.

Boards of health report that their expenditures on training and development in 2007 ranged from 0.15% to 1.65% of their total budgets, with most under 1% (32 out of 36).

The CRC recognized that professional development is a key to increasing staff satisfaction, improving staff retention and improving the quality of public health service delivery. Their report comments that public health units need deliberate strategies to provide professional development to address both program and discipline needs, and that innovative strategies need to be considered, such as subsidized refresher courses, scholarship programs, training networks and activities related to developing core competencies. The CRC recommended that public health units support training and staff development with expenditures in the range of 1% - 2% of their overall budgets. 124

Indicator Definition

Definition:

Percent of board of health total actual expenditures for "core and related public health programs and services" used to support staff training and professional development in 2007.

Staff training and professional development costs include training and educational services for vocational, technical training, professional courses and seminars; may include payments to external trainers, conference registration fees, tuition fees and payments for associated textbooks, registration and course delivery costs such as library access fees, costs associated with conferences, seminars and internally developed courses, as well as associated event costs such as payments to guest speakers, trainers, catering and space rental fees. Excludes any associated travel costs and any fees paid to register with a professional regulatory body.

Data Source(s):

Survey of boards of health, 2008

Numerator: Actual board of health expenditures on staff training and professional development
Denominator: Total board of health actual expenditures (core and related)

Formula:

Board of health actual expenditures on staff training and professional development

Total board of health actual expenditures
 
x 100

Notes:

  • Larger public health units may be able to achieve economies of scale that would lower their per staff cost for training and development
  • Survey did not collect information on the number of staff trained or number of days of training purchased
  • Reported expenditures may be estimates due to complexity of accessing training and development expenses that meet the proposed definition within the timeframe
  • Excluding travel costs may limit the ability to interpret the overall impact of training costs on the budgets of health units with high travel costs (i.e. northern health units)
Data
Expenditures on Training and Professional Development [PDF]
Table 2: Indicators by Public Health Unit [PDF]

124 Capacity Review Committee. Revitalizing Ontario’s public health capacity: a discussion of issues and options. Toronto, ON: Queen’s Printer for Ontario; 2005. Retrieved April 15, 2009 from: http://www.health.gov.on.ca/english/public/pub/ministry_reports/capacity_review05/
capacity_review05.pdf
.

TOP